My current research areas include legal argument mining, privacy-preserving NLP, and explainable and trustworthy models. My research track spans argument mining and computational argumentation, crowdsourcing, large-scale corpora, serious games, sentiment and sarcasm on social media, and semantic web.
Timour's current research areas include privacy-preserving NLP, differential privacy in graph neural networks, and privacy-preserving semantic representations of language.
Fabian's research area included legal argument mining, expert annotations, and low-resource and few-shot transfer learning for annotation recommendations.
Sarah explores ethical argumentation in scientific literature. Her thesis focuses on controversial technologies and automatic mining of absent, shifting, and evolving ethical arguments.
Manuel is a bachelor's student at the TU Darmstadt focusing on machine learning. He is currently writing his thesis on the effectiveness and impact on accuracy using differential privacy in NLP.
I'm happy to volunteer as a mentor for early career researchers at this year's Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL). One of the topics on the agenda is "How to survive grad school", I'm very much looking forward to some fresh perspectives!
Happy to join the Area Chairs for sentiment analysis and argument mining at this year's Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
I happily accepted an invitation to join the standing reviewer board of Computational Linguistics, the "longest-running publication devoted exclusively to the computational and mathematical properties of language".
Together with Isabelle Augenstein and tutorial chairs for NAACL, EMNLP, and ACL-IJCNLP, we are preparing the next year's selection of tutorials to be presented either virtually or in-person.
For full list, see my Google Scholar profile.
In this interdisciplinary collaboration, we look into argumentation in the verdicts of the European Court of Human Rights. What makes a verdict of a high importance? Is it the facts? Is it the argumentation pattern? Is it the judges? Or is it something left between the lines?
We combine legal expertise with transformer-based recommendation engines to scale up annotated data acquisition.
Chair for German, European and International Criminal Law and Procedure, Comparative Law and Legal Theory
Director of the Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP) Lab
Chair in Public Law, Information Law, Environmental Law and Legal Theory
Send me an e-mail
TU Darmstadt, Hochschulstraße 10, 64289 Darmstadt
ivan (dot) habernal (at) tu-darmstadt.de